When Discrimination is Good

This month marks the 75th anniversary of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, which was framed after the horror of WWII and looked to the future with hope.

Article 5 states, “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”.

That freedom to express ideas that others may not agree with, is being eroded more and more by populist politicians on the right – Putin, Bolsonaro or Trump. But also by commentators and opinion setters on the left who want us to tolerate difference as long as that difference aligns with their agenda.

We need to revive the skill of discrimination based on research, thoughtfulness and fact checking. The Oxford Dictionary defines this aspect of discriminating as showing discernment, judgement, insight and subtlety.

We should be able to discuss and disagree respectfully on lots of issues including religious belief or gender or football.

But social media and a culture of hyper-sensitivity encourages us to jump to quick conclusions and to judge without thinking carefully. JK Rowling was shouted down on Twitter this month when she defended the idea that gender is determined by biology. She was accused of transgender hatred, a crime that outweighs all Rowling’s achievements in the minds of many of her millennial Harry Potter fans.

Rowling was not denying the right of trans people to be treated fairly and with compassion. She WAS expressing concern about downplaying what it means to be ‘a woman’. She argued as many others do, that gender not just a social construct. It is biological as well. She was sardonic when she tweeted that “people who menstruate” used to be called “wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

How have we got to this point? Trans activism seems to trump all other rights and experiences. And more problematically, if anyone questions the woke view, they are mocked, sacked and de-platformed.

As intelligent humans, we must be strong enough to sift facts and face opposing views. Sometimes we will shift our views – and that is a healthy thing. At other times we will defend the right to hold different views.

We might not agree with everything a person says, but we need to uphold their right to speak. We can choose not to be offended by a careless joke or a thoughtless jibe made in anger. We can weigh up the person, the ideas and the facts. THEN, if we conclude that those views are so hate-filled or deliberately provocative that free speech is trampled by bigotry, we SHOULD speak out.

We need to discriminate and use common sense lest we judge too quickly. As Barack Obama said late last year, “The world is messy, there are ambiguities. People who do good stuff have flaws.”

And in case you think that sounds like a cop-out, consider who is speaking and his experience of politics and prejudice.

Margaret Attwood is an author (most famously, The Handmaid’s Tale), with impeccable feminist credentials and clear intelligent thinking, who has faced ire on twitter because she has posted views considered anti-feminist. A few years ago she defended the right of a male academic to receive a fair hearing after he was accused of sexual assault by a female student. The man was completely cleared but sacked anyway.

Atwood’s point was that she was deemed a ‘bad feminist’ because she took the side of a man over that of a woman. She pointed out that she and all the others who campaigned, were defending a fair criminal process not a particular person.

When I follow the threads, many of the people with the most passionate and angry views seem not to have carefully read what Rowling or Atwood actually say.

Whose rights take precedence?

The Trans community is tiny (about 0.5% of the UK population) but has a very loud voice. So other groups that face ongoing prejudice and injustice like people with mental illness, indigenous communities or refugees are sidelined because their causes are not fashionable.

Feminists are divided over what to think of transgender rights. Is being a woman a unique experience for those born with the XX chromosome?

The debate over biological sex and gender thunders on. It is apparently credible now to refer to a ‘mother’ as ‘a birthing parent’ – a term that reduces the love, commitment and bond of motherhood to a physical function. And which reduces the value of female experience. I get how the debate started in the field of adoption, but it has become a battleground now. In seeking to offer sympathy to these new iterations, we are denying the right to express support for families with a mum and dad.

Whose voice takes precedence?

In the strong response to JK Rowling, Emma Watson (Hermione Grainger in the Harry Potter films) tweeted, “Trans people are who they say they are and deserve to live their lives without being constantly questioned.”

Her opinion about gender self-determination was accepted at face value, even though it is simplistic to claim that we are who we say we are – we are influenced and shaped by all sorts of outside forces, good and bad as well as by biology. Our selfhood is more than our feelings or mood. It was this complicated balance of nature vs nurture that Rowling was trying to explore and which Watson ignored.

So I plead for thoughtfulness and ‘discrimination’ of the best sort when we examine these complex ethical and medical issues.

More to read:

You might like to explore ideas further:

A new book by Dr. Sharon Moalem offers powerful evidence from research, case studies and his own patients, of the importance of the extra X chromosome. Moalem explains why females triumph over males when it comes to immunity, resilience, intellect, stamina and much more.

There is growing research about the negative emotional impact of transitioning. The Sunday Times ran an article on July 12th 2020 and the pressure children face who are confused about their gender and who attend the UK’s gender clinic

10 thoughts on “When Discrimination is Good

  1. Much thanks for this reminder. If we’re to step back from an ultra liberalisation which confuses free speech with bigotry this is a helpful contribution in the right direction


  2. “We should be able to discuss and disagree respectfully on lots of issues”: I agree. As a nation we seem to have lost the ability to disagree with someone and at the same to honour and respect them (both in the way we disagree with them, and in allowing them the space to disagree with us). This is a key way in these complex times in which as Christians we can love our neighbours.


  3. Yes, this is a really powerful point, Amanda and I agree with you. However, there is sometimes a Venn diagram in which free speech, hate speech, and different opinions, coincide. We then have a problem because it becomes a personal opinion as to whether what someone is saying can be classified as ‘hate speech’ simply because I don’t agree with what they’re saying. And therein lies the rub.

    I feel very strongly that Christians are called to live as Christ in the world we are in. It’s a very different world than in previous centuries, and yet, the Church is in place too bring the presence of Jesus wherever we are. So, this is our world, our context, our mission field, our place of being a light and salt. I do not believe we can do that by laying out our ‘rules’ and demanding everyone to comply with them, which is what the Church so often translate4s as being a light and salt. More fundamentally (not in the religious sense of the word) Jesus is love, is insightful, is aware of the issues behind the issues in His interaction with humanity and He stood for the wellbeing of the people He supported. He did not stand for the religious and the law keepers.

    That means life becomes more difficult for the Christian as we strive to negotiate the minefield of living like Jesus, addressing issues as He did, and maintaining our understanding of who He is in our own lives and therefore in the world. I suppose we’re going to have to look to Him every day and in every circumstance to work out our own stance. The struggle is real.


  4. The struggle is indeed real. To be wise as serpents, yet innocent as doves. Today during our bible study zoom call, we reflected on the story in Acts about Phillip and the Eunuch. Philip, a Jew, spent time with essentially someone from a different gender, race, social class. He did not let these differences deter him. He responded to the questions of the Eunuch, and subsequently shared the the gospel of Jesus. I think there is something we can learn in that story. About listening, responding and also yet emphasising the hope that is in Christ alone. May we all have courage to do this not only behind the screen (which I am guilty of) but also in our real lives.


  5. Amanda, thank you. In this time of noise and confusion, there is often a tendency to be silent. I appreciate your perspective and willingness to speak.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s